Inception (Blu-ray)

This is an excellent film. It's a daring film too. Like another film, The Usual Suspects, it starts in the present with a scene between an old man and a young one. The old man asks him what he wants and the young man struggles to recall what he wants from the old man. It leads to the start of the story in the past and an extraction job on the train to Kyoto, Saito's offer to Cobb, the assembly of the team, putting together their game plan for putting an idea into a financial rival's mind, the dream shared aboard the jet, onto the opening scene again when the young man why he's here then onto the final scene. The plot is superb. One man, Cobb, wants to find his way home to his family while another one, Saito, is willing to pay a fortune to change the outcome of events with a rival business firm through the inception of an idea into his rival's mind. The cast is also superb. It took more than Leonard DiCaprio to pull this story off. In this case there was some strong writing. Something closer to six or seven characters were needed for the development of the plot. Is it too complicated or just too intriguing? I really enjoy watching a good film again and again and have truly enjoyed Inception. Dreaming by itself was no basis for a story but to the credit of Inception it introduced dream-sharing by way of a new technology. In view of the developments over the past 60 years viewers will find it quite easy enough to suspend their disbelief. Cobb and his wife, Mal, put the learning to use by way of extracting ideas by people. Once they began building dreams within dreams extraction was easier but time moves at a different and slower pace at various levels of a dream. It can also become difficult to distinguish a dream from reality and they finally lose their way into the sub-conscious. After fifty years down there Cobb tries inception on Mal and plants an idea in her mind which leads to their return but Mal suspects that she's still dreaming and wants Cobb to return to reality. One night she tries to blackmail Cobb by informing the police that she suspects her husband will kill her. Dreams can be usually brought to an end when the dreamer runs out of time on the machine or is killed. After she kills herself Cobb leaves the country to avoid arrest but he's still deeply filled with regret and guilt about Mal who is constantly trying to keep him with her. It's interesting how one storyline is affecting the other one and the characterization which results from it. Ken Watanabe plays Mr. Saito. He's heard about extraction and rumours about conception. He's convinced that he will be financially ruined by his rival, Mr. Fischer. Now he's heard rumors about Cobb's skill but before he asks Cobb he wants to make sure that he's talking to the right mind. So he arranges an audition for Cobb's crew under tough conditions with himself as the target. Cobb extracts the information but he realizes that Saito has known all along about the job from start and asks why? Saito was never interested in the extraction but the level of Cobb's skill. While Cobb extracted the information, Saito wasn't impressed with the level of skill that Cobb showed. His opinion of Cobb quickly rises when he realizes that he's still dreaming. Cobb placed him in a dream inside a dream. In the following scene Saito makes an offer to Cobb of financial reward and a safe return to America if he can succeed in planting an idea in his rival's mind. Money is no problem with Saito. So Cobb finds a top-notch crew who will work for him and his partner, Arthur. DiCaprio clearly dominates the first crew but when Saito tells him to put together a better team he becomes part of the team. Michael Caine puts in a strong appareanance as Cobb's father-in-law who finds him another architect in dream-sharing, Ariadne played by Ellen Page. Then it's onto Africa for an interview with an old friend, Eames played by Tom Hardy, who's a skillful thief and forger and introduces Cobb to Yusuf, the Chemist played by Dileep Rao. Fischer, played by Cillian Murphy, puts in another good performance as Saito's rival. What's really interesting are all the contributions everybody makes towards the development of the story. It is a well written story and well performed one. You'll also appreciate the quick pace. While the dream starts on the jet. The levels of the dream can always be identified. The first level of the dream can always be identified by the rain in a city downtown. The primary development is the appearance of projections from Fischer's mind into dream who will defend him against any attempt at extraction. On this level Saito is shot and dying but on the lower levels it will take longer for him to die. Eames attempts to kill him and end the dream but the sedative taken demands their return to consciousness in a particular fashion. If they die they are lost in a sub-consciousness of the dreamer. So they must go onto the next level of the dream inside a van that Yusuf is driving. The second level of the dream is found in an expensive hotel where Cobb plays a figure on this level known as Mr. Charles and poses as one of the projections sent to guard Fischer. Mr. Charles gains Fischer's trust and convinces him that a corporate figure in his father's company is betraying him and the only way to learn the truth is entering a third level of the dream. The third level takes place in winter and the mountains where Fischer fights to learn the truth and the team plants an idea in him.In the meantime Saito dies during the assault. The scenes in the sub-conscicous take place in beautiful weather on the seaside. The final beach scene leads you to an earlier scene from the start of the film: an old man asks Cobb what he wants. The old man is Saito who was killed and has been lost for years. Cobb now remembers the audition for Saito, the inception and his confrontation with Mal. He urges Saito, now an old man filled with his regrets and guilt to come back with him and be young again. Well, the next scene tells you what happen he finds himself waking aboard the jet with Fischer, Saito and his crew. Saito places a call to set things in motion which will clear the way for Cobb's return home. I've seen this film on numerous occasions over the past few years. It just keeps getting better. It only proves the importance of good writing and acting to one another as well as editing and directing. Suspense simply is not a factor. Yet the story constantly grips you. You simply don't realize the length of the film by its quick pace of the story.

Christopher Nolan may be the most brilliant, unconventional mainstream director working in Hollywood today, crafting intricate stories where narrative forms are stretched and twisted. Nowhere is this more obvious than "Inception," which turns into a multi-level Möbius strip -- worlds within worlds, dreams within dreams. Nolan delights in being able to conjure strange worlds that could never exist in real life, but he crafts a very heartfelt, powerful story for those visuals -- a story of love and loss, ambition and power, and a broken man haunted by guilt that constantly chases him through every dream. In the not-too-distant future (next Sunday A.D.), the military has created a technology that allows artificial shared dreaming. Within multi-leveled dreams, architects can create elaborate worlds, and special "extractors" can get information from a sleeping subject's brain. Oh, and there are several layers of dreaming, each with a different period of time passing. The movie opens with Dom Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio) and his partner Arthur (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) trying to extract some information from tycoon Saito (Ken Watanabe). It turns out that this was actually an elaborate audition by Saito, who wants to hire them for an "inception" -- to plant a new idea in someone's head. Cobb isn't interested until Saito offers to clear him of the murder of his wife, which would allow him to return to his young children. Their target: Robert Fischer (Cillian Murphy), who has just inherited a massive energy conglomerate from his cold, callous father. Saito wants the company dissolved before it can become too powerful, so he wants the idea incepted into Robert's head. So Cobb gets together a gang of the best: clever forger Eames (Tom Hardy), dream-chemist Yusuf (Dileep Rao), and the new architect Ariadne (Ellen Page). But only Ariadne sees how troubled Cobb is, and that the memory of his dead wife Mal (Marion Cotillard) is deliberately sabotaging every mission he undertakes. As the team weaves their elaborate web of deception and dreams around Robert, Cobb finds that his demons are threatening their mission. You have to give it to Christopher Nolan: he doesn't dumb down his movies for the masses. "Inception" is a hard movie to even summarize because it's constantly growing more complicated -- the team is spread out over different dream levels, with different time periods passing and different perils attacking them simultaneously. It's half heist caper and half sci-fi meta-thriller... if that even makes sense. And while Nolan sculpts a strange Escheresque dream-world of labyrinths and never-ending stairs, he also crafts some powerful subplots about love and loss. As the plot unwinds, he intertwines Cobb and Fischer's personal issues with the main story of inception. Suddenly the constant firefights, explosions and free-falling elevators/vans aren't the only reason we're invested -- the audience is truly left wanting to see both men work out their issues and find some measure of inner peace. It also has spectacularly good special effects, particularly Arthur's battle in the hotel -- he scampers across the walls and ceilings, grappling with projections as he floats through empty halls. Not to mention the scene where Ariadne turns a whole city upside-down... literally. Honestly, the biggest problem with the movie is that the dreams sometimes make too much sense. Why do Fischer's projections have to actually TRAVEL to attack the team instead of... I don't know, materializing inside the building? Nolan also populates "Inception" with a lot of actors that he's cast in other projects, especially "The Dark Knight Rises." In fact, I can't help but wonder if DiCaprio's role was originally offered to Christian Bale, because we've also got Cotillard, Hardy, Watanabe, Murphy, Gordon-Levitt and Michael Caine. There are actually only a couple major actors who haven't worked with Nolan elsewhere. But this is one of DiCaprio's best roles, even if he's not very convincing as a father -- his Cobb is riddled with guilt and numb sorrow, and it's only prodding from Ariadne that finally gets him to confront his issues. All the other actors give lovely performances as well -- Cotillard is particularly wrenching as a strange shallow shade of a madwoman, as is Murphy as the downtrodden son of a powerful man. "Inception" is the kind of movie that we desperately need more of -- a wild Möbius strip of complex ideas, brilliant direction and powerful acting. This is truly a one-of-a-kind film, and not one to be missed.

I don’t get to watch a lot of movies but I always feel drawn to this one. The adventure, the premise, they’re just so out of the ordinary but you can imagine it being possible. Even with lucid dreaming you could approach some of the ideas in this movie. There are twists, uncomfortable situations, humor, massive suspense and unknowns. It’s just a great movie and the ending keeps you hanging just enough to be intriguing. I’ll watch it again and again forever.

So many thought provoking twists and turns leaves you thinking

4.5 / 5 Stars Fascinating ! Captivating story, thought provoking, great visuals ! ... too much shooting and hunting ... In reply to the review entitled "Rating Depends On How Much Foreign Film You've Watched" I say: I do not see much ***correlation*** between "Inception" and "L'Année dernière à Marienbad" or "Hiroshima mon amour", to the point that one might say these two Alain Resnais French films of 1961 and 1959, respectively are ... more original ... or deeper. I have watched these two films without subtitles. "Inception" is interesting, quite original, an attempt to explore the world of dreams. The exploration is a combination of known things about dreams (e.g. outside stimuli influence dreams), and lesser known things (questions), such as "What happens when we die in a dream ?", "How is a dream within a dream ?", "What happens if two or more people could share a dream ?" The answers Chris Nolan (both British and American by birth) offers, may be viewed as speculations, of course, but, nonetheless are interesting. Not seldom he gets the Physics right - Gravity (= acceleration, as Einstein points out): loss of it; creation of temporal artificial gravity. Chris Nolan suggest that Gravity effects propagate to dreams - true or not, but interesting. He even suggests that in a dream world, Gravitation my pull in multiple directions ! Why not ?! I have my own questions: - Will understanding dreams help us further uncover the mysteries of the mind ? - Will we ever be able to design dreams - ours and others ? - Will we ever be able to share dreams ? Will this be useful ? - Will we be able to visualize dreams, say on a TV scream dreams ? - ours and others ? - Will this help treat currently incurable and most destructive mind (brain) diseases such as Schizophrenia, Bipolar Syndrome, Alzheimer, Parkinson ? - Will we ever be able to do "Extraction" and "Inception" ? - for non-harmful, maybe good purposes ... So, while we may not fully agree with the story proposed to us, the film is thought provoking, but, because of the nested layered dreams (dreams within a dream within a dream ...), hard to follow for many viewers. That is where the DVD/Blu-ray comes to the rescue - Rewind (many times) ! Not possible in the theater, but easily done at home. Next, please, pay attention: at the end of the film, the top ("toupie" in French, right ?) is still spinning, which allows us, the viewer, to formulate two possible interpretations: 1) It is, finally reality; 2) It is (still) a dream - maybe, everything was a dream from the very beginning ... A fantasy ? A good work of art (visual or written) should be susceptible to multiple interpretations, right ? Hamlet: he is tormented - maybe he really saw (the ghost of) his father, maybe not, maybe his uncle murdered his father, maybe not ... should I take punitive action or not (" ... to be or not to be ... "). The Penrose Steps (nice drawings by Max Escher !) - an optical illusion: are we going up or down ? Maybe both at the same time. I like Leonardo di Caprio and Marion Cotillard a lot. The personal story of the characters they play (story which causes trouble to all) brings humanity and depth to this film, and the two actors are very convincing in their roles. By the way, "Mal" means "bad" in French. My only real criticism is this (therefore 4.5/5 stars): too much shooting, too many people chasing each other, and too often (a diversion/distraction)- it makes it more attractive to some viewers, but ***lowers*** the overall value of the film ! It makes it look "less deep" than Chris Nolan would have liked. Notice this: The Academy nominated this film in several categories, among others: "Best Film" (which refers to the producers, one being Chris Nolan), "Best Original Story" (Chris Nolan), but not "Best Director" (who is also Chris Nolan). Maybe this is due exactly to the fact others noticed the same thing: long and frequent chases, lots of shooting ... The thrilling should come more from the tension between characters, from the collision between their minds and souls, their problems, worries, and less from fast paced and sustained action sequences. Last but not least, I like the use of one of my longtime favorite songs: "Non, je ne regrette rien" sung by Edith Piaf. It is used in the film as a signal to wake-up the dreamers in a synchronized fashion (it even propagates from one dream level to the next), but, perhaps it also means this: no matter what happens, or happened, whether this is reality or it is just a dream, I do not take anything back (I regret nothing). Good quality with extra features Blue-ray. I do not regret having watched.

My teen boys and I enjoy movies that keep your brain moving and this fit the bill perfect. We really enjoyed it for our family movie night. It was nice to have a relatively "clean" movie that kept your attention without overloading you with profanity or sexual content.

I suppose many people have written at length about the DVDs (and/or Blu-ray) discs and all its "bells and whistles" that come with it. For me, I will say this: This film has been a long time in the making. As an artist in several mediums, film included, I can relate to some simple thoughts for those wondering about the movie "Inception" itself. I met Christopher Nolan last century (weird to say) at an international film festival when "Memento" was first screened. I thought that movie was brilliantly presented and unique - as was his less successful, but still intriguing, previous venture "Following". The movie "Inception" was something that was on Nolan's mind for quite a long time. His problem: The trouble with creative ideas, especially when involving such a semi-uncharted realm of "dreams" as your grounded subject matter, is hard for one to convey such unique, fresh ideas into a visually physical and presentable piece. However, Nolan finally succeeded with "Inception". As technology (CGI) had increased exponentially for creative potentials such as bringing artists' dreams into something visceral and presentable, this film became more and more "do-able" for him as a project. In this century, as the art (almost seemingly lost amongst so many writers and directors lately) seems to have turned into massively (almost mindless) "action"-packed, substance-lessness groups of movie re-makes, comic books and consumer entities turned into trite-made-flesh "movies", and the seemingly endless amount of sequels (which most should have ended a few sequels back) and, along with that, the upsurge in "prequels" (have we really started running out of originality?),I personally find it more difficult to even "want" to see a movie in the theater unless its something with possible unique potential as something fresh, new and (at some point in the past) even "unthinkable" as a premise for a movie. Afterall: 2 people seeing a movie these days is a major financial investment at $10-$12+ per ticket... and gods help you if either one of you wants something edible, even simply a $5 bottle of water! And even though I'm only in my later 30s, yes, seriously kids: things were much different - and cheaper - in the 80's and 90's as a movie-going enthusiast. I suppose that's why, when you pay less for something, if it was a "crappy movie", the let down wasn't that bad. Nowadays, if something doesn't impress you, the "investment" you put into hoping to see a movie becomes something that could backfire and "depress" you. So I was very glad to be even moreso impressed than I was expecting when I saw "Inception". It is a fresh story which is artisticly and meticulously woven into a high-quality film which presents the idea of a world (whose time period we aren't really told, but we come to accept as either a future or a possible reality of the "near-present day" realm) where the most precious commodities that exist that we would like to think are not in another's grasp: an idea... a thought... a dream... could become something of a tangible commodity to others with an ulterior interest. The movie presents you with the "what if" premise that some of your most gaurded, personal thoughts and ideas, buried inside your own mind which may emerge in your own dreams, could actually be visited, viewed, experienced... and stolen. It's a disturbing thought on one hand. On the other hand, it makes for something fresh and incredibly imaginative to be explored and presented in a cinematic format. I won't go in depth and throw spoilers and such about the movie, because this is one of those rare movies that I personally wanted to know very little about beforehand... and walk into the theater (of for those of you now: to be able to rent or buy this film) knowing not much about what you are about to see. And that's why I enjoyed it so much when I saw it in the theaters. It is a fresh concept, a movie in this time of regurgitated cinema sparkle and fodder which kept me so engaged. The ideas were new, fresh and imaginative. The premises and layers (literally) of thought involved in this piece that echoes a famous line from Edgar A. Poe's writings: "All that we see or seem, is but a dream within a dream." From start to finish, this may not be a movie some people will be able to fully absorb and comprehend all its beauitfully creative details and uniquities, as its pace doesn't waver to do a "time-out" for the viewing audience to try and explain it all to you - and some people may find that an irritation indemic of the "I want to know everything explained to me now" generation/group of impatient "movie-goers". However, what makes "Inception" unique is that we find ourselves somehow going along for its ride, like the finality of beginning a long roller coaster ride which, once seated, you are in for many unexpected twists, turns, and thrilling experiences along the way. You find yourself accepting things momentarily as if: "that's ok... this is a dream anyway... right?" You may even find yourself falling deeper into accepting these realms with all their ideas and concepts that defy what we assume are constants - like, oh, the laws of physics, gravity and logic. But hey it's just about a dream ...right? Well hang on, because you most likely will find yourself becoming pulled into the film, catching yourself momentarily uttering, silently, "Whoa, I did not see this coming," and futher down the rabbit hole you go. As with most of Nolan's original works of the 90's, "Inception" is, in my opinion, his shining jewel. And it should be, considering how many years upon years he kept this movie as a work-in-progress in his mind (and a journal or two). Luckily, so far his guarded thoughts weren't something easily up to be stolen while he slept. It's a rewarding experience that deserves to be taken in - because honestly, how often do you see something unique in movies and say to yourself (either during or after the end credits) "I never saw or thought of something like that before... in my life... and I just saw it on screen" ...? It's also an experience that deserves to be watched again, because once you've seen it (like taking the red pill in "The Matrix"), there is no going back. Therefore moving forward is the only option you have. Rewatching it helps you take in more of the concepts: It is truly an amazing feat of accomplishment to bring the realm of thoughts and dreams out with ideas not oft (if ever) explored in past films that somehow work incredibly well together here. The visual beauty of the work of the cinematic art in its entirity (and all its little details). Nolan insisted continually through this movie to physically film things visually in the real-life recording moments themselves as much as humanly (and safely) possible, only ending with astoundingly artiful merging of additions and touch-ups with the usage of CGI to blend in what couldn't be physically filmed in real life... and trust me, some of the things you see make you feel a sense of accepting the unlimited possibilities that can be explored in the future of movies, stories, etc involving the subject matter of our consciousness... and our sub/unconsciousness. And on an extra note (as a person who works in the music industry): the sound engineering was amazing and its accolades and awards were justified - exceeding (and shocking) my own expectations. The Blu-ray 2-disc edition is what I purchased, and I found it to be rewarding enough to see how many of the visually stunning scenes were created and even how the sound engineering was accomplished! It was also shocking to see how many of the scenes were shot - including what I thought was CGI which turned out to be real... etc etc. This would be one of the few movies I own whose "extras" I found myself interested in watching entirely. I believe there is an option to "interrupt" the movie momentarily to view "how they did that scene you just watched" during the movie, but they are just as easily accessible as parts to watch on their own. Again, this movie will inevitably beg for you to watch it again... and you don't want to be interrupting it every 10 or 15 minutes to see some behind the scenes moment DURING the movie. Maybe save that for the 3rd+ time you've seen it, if you're into that. Because hands down, this was one of those rare movies I said to myself: "Finally! Something original, creative, beautiful, imaginative and not wavering and bending over backwards to 'meet' or 'fit' into the seemingly typical Hollywood format of what Hollywood considers the 'proper format' of how a movie 'has to be' in order to make money." Because it worked fine all on its own. I believe the Oscar awards spoke up on their own earlier this year as well. Jason Kraley

Favorite movie! Notice something new every time

Fantastic movie, highly recommend getting it. This movie shouldn't be streamed, you should own it. Don't know if the 4k version is worth it tho, I mean it looks good but it's obviously not on the same quality level as a modern movie that is actually shot in 4k. Standard blu ray might be more than sufficient if you want to save some money, tho I can't confirm since I don't have the standard blu ray.

Para empezar esta es una gran pelicula a un buen precio por traer 2 blu rays y un dvd, y como siempre amazon fue rapido y el envio fue barato, el problema es que la caja llego en un muy mal estado; la caja no cierra, la parte superior de la caja esta rota, la mica que protege la foto esta toda golpeada. Yo nunca habia tenido este problema con amazon y lo mas seguro es que pida la devolucion. Editado: Despues de hacer la devolucion, el pedido tardo un dia en llegarme, excelente servicio

Mit "Inception" hat Regisseur Christopher Nolan ein Meisterwerk geschaffen, wie es kein anderer geschafft hätte. Mit Darstellern, die auf der ganzen Linie überzeugen, einer Optik, die jedem Grafik-Designer das Wasser im Mund zusammenlaufen lässt, und mit einer Story, die verschachtelt und gut durchdacht ist. Ich widme mich lediglich dem Film und der Qualität des Films, nicht dem Bonusmaterial. Zur Story: Dom Cobb, gespielt von Leonardo DiCaprio, stiehlt als "Extractor" die Gedanken, Geheimnisse und Ideen von Menschen. Dazu versetzt er seine Opfer in einen Schlafzustand, um so in die Träume einzudringen und die gewünschte Information zu entwenden. Diese Form der Spionage ist eine sehr komplexe Technik, und Cobb ist der beste seines Fachs. Doch sein Beruf birgt Gefahr: Da er ein begehrter Industriespion ist, ist er ständig auf der Flucht. Und nun bekommt er einen Auftrag, mit dem er sein Leben wieder ins reine rücken kann: "Inception". Dabei wird kein Gedanke gestohlen, sondern der Zielperson wird ein Gedanke eingepflanzt. Dies ist jedoch ein immenses Vorhaben, da so der Charakter der Person komplett verändert werden kann; die Person könnte den Gedanken auch garnicht erst annehmen. Daher wird ein Team aus Experten benötigt, um die Inception richtig zu erfüllen. Dabei wird nicht nur das Team von Cobb auf eine harte Probe gestellt, sondern auch er selbst: den Cobb, um Genau zu sein seine Vergangenheit, wird zu einer echten Bedrohung. Die Geschichte des Films wird dynamisch erzählt und nach und nach wird der Zuschauer in die traurige Vergangenheit von Dom Cobb geführt. Der Film hat eine Menge Actionszenen, u.a. Schusswechsel und Verfolgungsjagten, die den Spannungsbogen stets auf hohem Niveau halten. Die Schauspieler setzten die Ideen von Nolan grandios um vor allem Leonardo DiCabrio und Ellen Page glänzen in Paraderollen. Die Story ist tiefgründig, aber nicht zu komplex. So geht die Geschichte des Films nicht in der bombastischen Visuallisierung und dem genau so bombastischen Sound unter. Optik & Sound: Hier glänzt der Film auf der ganzen Linie. Die Effekte, die Kameraführung und der Ton sind Punkte, in denen Inception der Konkurrenz nicht nur davonläuft, sondern schon in den Zug steigt und allen davonrauscht. Schließlich gab es nicht grundlos Oscars für visuelle Effekte, Kamera, Ton und Tonschnitt. Schon in der ersten Traumszene zeigt der Film, dass er ein optischer Gaumenschmaus ist. Der Soundtrack zum Film ist ebenso Perfekt wie die Optik. Doch dieses Feuerwerk an Effekten muss man selbst gesehen haben. Fazit: Inception ist ein Film, dessen Idee grandios umgesetzt wurde. Mit einmaligen Effekten, einer Runde Spitzenschauspieler, bombigen Sound und einer komplizierten wie genialen Story ist es durchaus ein Film, der das Prädikat "besonders wertvoll" verdient hat. Doch der Film ist nicht perfekt. Man muss dem Film die ganze Zeit folgen, um nicht von der Story überrumpelt zu werden. Somit ist es kein Film, den man sich ansieht und währenddessen ein Sudoku macht, da man so keine Freude mit dem Film haben wird. Auch wurde häufig schon gesagt "der Film ist schlecht, da er viel zu kompliziert und die Handlung wirr und unsinnig ist". Dies kann ich nur verneinen. Der Film regt zum nachdenken an und ist in keinster Weise "unsinnig", sondern nur keiner dieser "0-Prozent-Hirn-100-Prozent-Action-und-schöne-Frauen"-Filme. Statt dessen bekommt man einen "100-Prozent-Hirn-100-Prozent-Action"-Film, der trotz seiner bahnbrechenden Story verkannt wird. Meiner Meinung nach: Ein Film, der die Latte für gute Filme deutlich anhebt und mit einmaliger Qualität ind Bild und Ton brilliert.

Un Blu-ray eccellente: la qualità video in 4K HDR è fantastica, colori vividi e dettagli nitidi, mentre l’audio è chiaro e pieno, davvero coinvolgente. Il packaging è semplice e classico, come ci si aspetta da un Blu-ray, ma l’esperienza complessiva di visione è ottima. Perfetto sia per collezionare che per guardare il film in alta qualità.

100% OK Goede verzending en besteld item beantwoorde volledig aan de beschrijving van de verkoper ( uiterst tevreden ) :-):-):-)