BX80677I37100 7th Gen Core Desktop Processors

Such a good bang for your buck. I built a super slim mini ITX build in a Silverstone Raven small form factor case. It is about the size of the old Dell desktops my company used to use. The case is a lot less bulky than typical PC builds, but for a minimal build with this processor it was perfect. According to benchmarks on UserBenchmark this processor performs nearly exactly the same as my laptop processor. My laptop processor is a quad core i7-6700hq. This dual core processor performs just as well as my laptop quad core. I put in a GTX 1050 TI graphics card which also near exactly matches the performance of my laptop's GTX 970m. With this processor I build a desktop that can do everything my laptop can do, but for a third of the cost. Pretty awesome low end processor! One thing I forgot to mention is that it comes with its own stock fan/heatsink. Had I known this I wouldn't have bought the $40 noctua low profile fan. Since you can't overclock this processor you really don't need a better cooler than the stock one. I bought an i7-6700K last year and that didn't come with a fan or heatsink, so I didn't think this one would. If you have an i5 or i7 processor I'd buy an aftermarket cooler. For an i3 like this one just use the stock. You really aren't going to see any performance benefits.

I wanted a low wattage CPU that would work well for gaming. For those that don't know many games even today really only use 1 core at a time. This puppy is extremely low wattage to begin with (lower wattage= less heat generated) and hopefully longer system life. This i3's single core performance is up there with $350+ xeons and i7's. So for the price it's very impressive as long as your games can only use 1 or 2 cores at a time. For a bit of education if you do ctrl+alt+delete and it looks like a game or process is using all cores equally it is usually a lie. It is in reality one core getting hammered at 100% then jumping to the next one in the series. You have to actually research to figure out how many cores your game actually uses at one time. If you aren't a gamer and for some reason are building a desktop for casual internet use like watching youtube videos and browsing the internet an i3 like this is probably the best thing for you to buy. Especially since it will actually save you money over a beefier processor that you will never actually fully utilize anyway.

bought an i3-7100 because i felt my fx 6300 wasn't stable for my gaming needs. I paired this with my gtx 1060 6gb and i was surprised how its able to keep over 60 fps unlike my fx the frames were everywhere. not the best cpu that will take advantage for the 1060 but i was just looking for something in budget to keep me steady over 60 fps while i save for a top cpu. I was never an Intel fan nor AMD fan but switching to intel was the best move i have done. this is something i want to mention if anyone is debating over intel or ryzen. a big reason i moved over to intel was because they haven't stop taking out processors and i have a good path of upgrading unlike amd with socket am3. now with ryzen out who know if that just for a while and then boom AMD leaves again for some years.

If you're doing basic web surfing, word processing, emailing, and Turbo Taxing, this CPU is truly excellent. It's inexpensive, low power, low heat, and low fan noise. You would bump to the i5 or i7 if you are regularly doing tasks that benefit from more cores: compiling lots of computer program code, re-encoding [pirated] videos, etc. There are lots of special circumstances where an i5 or i7 is useful; if you're one of those special people you already know it. If not, then this 3.9 GHz i3 is a great CPU. (P.S.: at work I have a 12-core machine and compile a whole lot of computer code; at home, the i3 is my gem.)

Built my first comp a few weeks ago on a budget, was a little skeptical on getting an i3 over i5 (i7 was definitely not in the budget). But i was impressed by it's out of the box specs and has good reviews so i saved the $100 and put it towards better graphics card and more RAM. I am impressed so far, does everything i've asked out of it just fine. Only complaint is it will get a little bogged down (and i do mean only a little) when you have a ton of screens open and doing a lot of stuff at the same time (Steam, LoL, CSGO, RL, Google, Settings), but that was only after i first turned it on and was trying to update/dl everything and play games all at the same time. But its only a dual core and i knew that going in, and its not typical that i run a ton of stuff at the same time. If you can afford the i5-7600k i would tell you to go for it, but if you are on a budget this is a great CPU.

For the price this is great, powers my 4k monitor for videos fine and runs the basics smoothly. I had a 7700k but decided to wait for the next generation and hope that it uses the same socket. For everyday tasks, web browsing, office, music, videos it runs smoothly and efficiently. For those tasks I could not see a difference at all between the two. I have not attempted any games with this and I use a different computer for video and photo editing so I cannot comment on that. If you are an average computer user and want to be using the latest generation of Intel products the I3-7100 will certainly do the job at a very low price.

This is a powerful little CPU that packs a lot of power and performance into a product that isn't very expensive. It's definitely a reasonable deal for its current price and it is worth every penny! I have been using this CPU in my personal desktop computer for six months, and it has been working great and stepping up to all the challenges that my not-too-overwhelming workload has been able to throw at it. I'd highly recommend it for anyone on a budget; there certainly are more powerful CPUs that can do a lot more, but at this price you can't beat this one! Thank you.

2 cores, 4 threads, very powerful with minimal power use and heat production. Using this for my home server running plex, recording security cam footage, etc. On 24/7 and barely breaks a sweat. Working out perfect as it uses about 8watts most of the time for the CPU, just my hard drives that are soaking up all the power.

Atendeu as minha expectativas e nos meus jogos o desempenho foi bom.

Der Basistakt liegt bei 3,9GHz und es gibt 2 Prozessorkerne. Das reicht also für einen Office-Rechner und für kleine Gamer-PCs locker aus. Man sollte nur wissen, dass der Prozessor dann irgendwann der Engpass sein wird, wenn man teurere Grafikkarten ab nVidia GeForce 1060 verwenden möchte. Geschätzt sollte die Leistung ausreichen, um mit einer nVidia GeForce 1050 angenehm spielen zu könne. Darüber hinaus wird der Prozessor wohl der Flaschenhals werden. Der Boxed-Kühler ist ja wie immer direkt für die Mülltonne bestimmt. Wer gerne einen leisen Computer haben möchte, dem kann ich nur empfehlen einen extra Prozessorkühler zu montieren. Geringere Temperaturen == leiserer Lüfter vom Kühler.

This is an excellent Processor. And it's all about our usage that How much do we use in our daily basis. For a good budget we can play or run almost that we need to do Nowadays.

El procesador está bien, tiene dos núcleos y es rápido, parece que en el futuro todo irá hacia más núcleos pero en un lustro este aguantará bien, pero es caro comparado al g4560. Yo queria el pentium para hacer un gaming barato y amazon me manda todos los componentes menos el procesador (que conseguí a menos de 60 €) y me cambia dos veces el dia de entrega del envio y lo sube de precio (se vé que intel no suministra los suficientes o hay mucha demanda) total que por no esperar un mes me gasto el doble por un procesador parecido(algo mejor). Ahora, montado bien, todo funciona.Cuando te gastas tanto dinero en piezas y necesitas tenerlo todo para montarlo y probarlo esperas más fiabilidad. Amazon me ha hecho ir mal esta vez. Hasta ahora siempre habia tenido experiencias buenas, pero esta vez me he preocupado. Bueno ahora ya tengo el ordenador y en fin no hay mal que por bien no venga, todo sea eso. El procesador es dual core, 4 hilos, frequencia alta, gama media baja pero suficient. Edito: Es un buen procesador, me sobra para gaming y uso de ofimatica y navegar por internet. El nuevo Ryzen 3 parece mejor pero no lleva gráfica así que este te hará el trabajo por un buen precio. (Que mal lo que hicieron conbel pentium 4560 que lo subieron de precio siendo un chollo, en fin...) La pega son 2 núcleos pero bueno 3 o 4 años aguantará bien, luego un i5 o 7 segunda mano estarán mucho más asequibles o directamente te cambias de plataforma.

CPU i3-7100 @ 3.9GHz monté sur une ASUS H110I-Plus Positifs: Performances excellentes pour des usages de bureautique et navigation Internet. (en tache unitaire/simple, il est env. 20% plus lent qu'un i7-7820X mais 6 fois moins cher). Négatifs: * Les variations des tarifs à 6 mois de la part du fondeur (Intel) sont légitimes; les variations quasi quotidiennes et infondées de Amazon comme des vendeurs tiers est illégitime. * Certains CPU 7ième génération indiquent "10 Windows requis"; évidemment cela n'a pas de sens pour le CPU qui se moque bien de l'OS utilisé; par contre les fournisseurs de drivers peuvent (du fait d'un accord avec Microsoft ou par "commodité" (flemme)) ne pas fournir de drivers pour le chipset/le composant graphique intégré au CPU; c'est le cas ici de Intel qui ne fournit un driver pour le GPU HD630 que pour W10; si le 1280x1024 convient vous pouvez installer *tous* OS Windows; pour les résolutions sup. avec le GPU intégré, il faudra W10 ou galérer avec un install manuel. Produit acheté au vendeur CPU-WORLD-UK LTD, livraison rapide en 2 jours, échanges mail excellent. Ajout au commentaire: Le GPU interne (HD630) est censé supporter la résolution 2560x1440 (sur des forums Intel, j'ai lu des experts Intel expliquer que c'est le cas et d'autres dire le contraire (!)). Après différents tests: le 2560x1440 est supporté pour un écran connecté en HDMI mais pas en DVI-Dual Link (on n'a alors que 2048x1152). Pas de test fait en DisplayPort, ce connecteur est rare sur le carte avec connecteurs vidéos. La limitaton de résolution est bien du au circuit HD630 de ce CPU, et non à la carte-mère sur lequel il est monté.